COST Action CA17132 - APPLY
European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis
Cagliari APPLY Training School: Argumentation and Pragmatics APPLY HERE, until July 30, 2022 University of Cagliari | September 19-21, 2022 The purpose of this training school is to introduce the participants to a variety of approaches to the study of argumentation and pragmatics, with an emphasis on the important and complex interactions between argumentation theories and pragmatic studies. THEME With…
8-9 September 2022 Venue: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Brescia Campus, Via Trieste, 17, 25121 Brescia, Italy, “Sala della Gloria” Scientific committee: Barbara De Cock, UCLouvain, Sara Greco, USI, and Sara Cigada, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Local organizer: Sara Cigada, (Centro di Linguistica dell’Università Cattolica – CLUC) https://brescia.unicatt.it/ Call for papers Contributions This workshop brings together different perspectives for…
Lisbon Summer School on Speech Acts in Public Discourse: Normative Questions 23-25 June 2022, NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon Theme The summer school is thematically related to the workshop on Norms of Public Argument: A Speech Act Perspective, held immediately after the summer school (June 27-29). Its focus is on the normativity of speech acts – and how…
WG2 Workshop, 21-22 April 2022: Norms of public argumentation: select theoretical perspectives and applications Centro Servizi di Ateneo Santa Chiara Lab, Università di Siena, Via Valdimontone 1 – 53100 Siena, Italy The workshop focuses on select theoretical perspectives and application cases for norms for public argumentation. Presenters are selected from the recent call for papers (now closed) for WG-2’s forthcoming…
Norms of Public Argument: A Speech Act Perspective Workshop at the NOVA University Lisbon, Portugal In person June 27-29, 2022 & Special issue of TOPOI: An International Review of Philosophy Summer school (June 23-25, 2022) Confirmed invited speakers: Rae Langton, University of Cambridge, UK Rae Helen Langton is currently the Knightbridge Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge.…
Örebro APPLY Training School: Multimodal Rhetoric and Argumentation in Public Policy Communication APPLY HERE, until February 14, 2022 Örebro University | April 5-7, 2022 The purpose of this training school is to introduce the participants to a variety of approaches to the study of the multimodal communication of public policy from the perspectives of rhetoric and argumentation studies. Theme With…
Argument technologies and public debate: the design perspective Wed, Thu & Fri, 29 SEPT – 01 OCT 2021 Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma, Italy The current version of the programme and book of abstract available for download. Please check this page regularly for updates. Working group 3 (“Designing Public Argumentation and Policymaking”) of the…
Discourses surrounding sustainability policies Mon & Tue, 27-28 SEP 2021 Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland Working group 1 (“Empirical Study of Public Argumentation”) of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (COST Action CA17132 – APPLY; https://publicpolicyargument.eu/) is pleased to organize this meeting on discourses surrounding sustainability, which includes submissions regarding: – The reconstruction of the…
Int. Workshop on Argumentative Norms in Public Policy: Between Reason and Unreason Mon & Tue, 27-28 SEP 2021 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Call for Abstracts and Discussants Working group 2 (“Norms for public argument”) of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (COST Action CA17132 – APPLY; https://publicpolicyargument.eu/) is pleased to invite submissions of abstracts (from…
Will be held at Faculty of Law, University of Trento, Italy (30 August – 4 September 2021)
It is generally agreed upon that epistemic use of the appeal to popular opinion is fallacious. In contrast, its use in political deliberation is often judged as potentially acceptable. Theme to be discussed in this session.
This model generalizes beyond argumentation, and sheds new light on a number of phenomena that have attracted the interest of social epistemologists such as epistemic bubbles and epistemic injustice, among others.
